Welcome to the Utopia Forums! Register a new account
The current time is Sat Sep 07 21:34:22 2024
Utopia Talk / Politics / The DNC A55a55ination Coup #3
Cherub Cow
Member | Mon Jul 22 18:38:47 Thread 2: http://uto...hread=93010&time=1721515403477 |
Cherub Cow
Member | Mon Jul 22 18:38:59 Thread 2 was not quite full yet, but the sebguls made it super ghey. We're back on track now with today's Hearing: "Oversight of the U.S. Secret Service and the Attempted [a55a55ination] of President Donald J. Trump" [GOP Oversight, Official YouTube; July 22nd, 2024] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hyP3tKtgtnw I'm still going through it, but most of the hearing is a joke since the Secret Service clammed up and gave the "ongoing investigation" line, but, surprisingly, AOC revealed something interesting (clipped here, but this occurs in the full video (above) at 2:02:00 ): http://x.com/bavarican_guy/status/1815432493002101088 AOC basically asks why the Secret Service did not have a perimeter which accounts for the effective range of common AR-15 builds. The Secret Service gives their non answer, of course (personnel, overwatch was in place, security expectations, etc.), but more importantly AOC reveals *why* she is asking: she is afraid for her own life. Someone in the comments points out that this is indeed personal for her, and I responded with this: ---------- She has to know what happens after the first domino falls. If the DNC had successfully made July 13th happen, they would have experienced tremendous asymmetric blowback. These MK Ultra opportunists select psychosis-inducers: the opposition whose existence most upsets them. ---------- I couldn't say it explicitly on Twitter, but it's a simple causal chain that I have mentioned before on the topic of tumblefag's myopic bloodlust and what it would cost him: • Stage 1: MK Ultra candidate* #1 takes the hint from Regime media and a55a55inates "Hitler 2.0" • Stage 2: MK Ultra candidate #2 sees "his guy" ("Hitler 2.0") has been killed by candidate #1, and he is now given psychological license to go after similar targets within the DNC. • Stage 3: MK Ultra candidates #3 – 20 know that this is the moment. They begin selecting DNC targets as well. • Stage 4: The Troubles begin. The primary psychosis-inducers in the DNC are.. - AOC - Rashida Tlaib - Ilhan Omar - Cori Bush - Ayanna Pressley - Nancy Pelosi - Chuck Schumer - Jamie Raskin - Biden / Harris - Warren - Klobucher And those are just some of the politicians. Most psychosis-inducers in the DNC exist within the media: - Anyone working at the View - Joy Reid - Psaki - KJP - Rachel Maddow - Jim Acosta - Dana Bash - Erin Burnett - Alisyn Camerota - Kaitlan Collins - Van Jones - Jake Tapper And the 3rd tier is where it gets messy. Most MK Ultra people work in places where they are somewhat familiar with the area or do not have to travel far. This means that most target selection occurs in local states among whatever DNC candidates are available — regardless of how much national attention those candidates have. This means secretaries of state who tried to remove Trump from the ballot, Democrats whose names appeared in the 2022 mid-terms, judges whose addresses are available, and any soft targets or targets of opportunity. In other words, if the a55a55ination attempt had been successful, myopic goblins get what they want ("[The object of our fixation is gone!]"), but blowback results in the mass death of their own political candidates. AOC knows that she is at the top of this list. And, again, these lists are based on psychosis-inducement — not based on practicality or strategic value. AOC, for instance, is a useful idiot with no strategic value within the DNC. But, she is insane, has power, says crazy things which irritate people, and is a figurehead for more insane leftists. That's literally all it takes. *(for you retards, I say, "MK Ultra candidate" not literally but to describe a particular known phenomenon. Any given population has a Normal Distribution of sanity. Psychosis propaganda is designed to increase the threshold of what people can rationalize to such an extent that the fringe elements of the Normal Distribution can no longer stand the propaganda and are pushed into action. This is, for instance, tumblefag's domain. The propaganda broke him, so his only recourse is to have sex with Trump, kill him, or gain sexual gratification from the spectacle of another person killing him.) |
tumbleweed
the wanderer | Mon Jul 22 19:10:51 is it your crazy contention that 'regime media' falsely painted Trump as some villain when he's completely innocent of any of their critique? & yet your list of Dems & media (primarily CNN) targets are responsible for bringing it on themself? odd you have no blame for Trump, who has unstable idiot supporters (see Qanon, Alex Jones, yourself... those believers love Trump, & it's specifically Trump, not Republicans) & Trump actively stirring up unjustified hate against so many... also, given this assassin so far appears to just be a guy who chose assassination over mass shooting & didn't really care what party he hit, just wanted someone known, then how is it a DNC attempt any more than an RNC attempt or FauxNews attempt or any entity who mentions politics attempt? i'm sure you'll have great answers (& hopefully you're being monitored) |
Cherub Cow
Member | Mon Jul 22 19:57:47 Do we notice that tumblefag did not address any steel man arguments and resorted to lies, subversion, and red herrings? You're a dumb bitch faggot, tumblefag, and your open lies and subversion are a threat to these United States, and you yourself are a likely direct and active threat to the well-being of Trump and his people. I, on the other hand, have repeatedly reiterated that political violence is absolutely a terrible idea, that it would only hurt this nation that I love, and that I would never engage in it nor condone it. Your opposition to this post is merely you casting red herrings to deflect from the real issues that Regime media was stoking. You have not responded to these steel man issues because you are a coward and illiterate. You are even too stupid to realize why I would only list DNC figures: it's because I was talking about blowback, you retard. We know — for a fact — that Regime media provoked the a55a55ination against Trump. It was their goal, and they nearly delivered on their overt goal. Regime media repeatedly and openly referred to Trump as "a threat to our democracy", cast him as a "dictator", lied about him being a "fascist", lied about him being "[Hitler 2.0]", and used all manner of absurd and delusional propaganda to justify in the minds of their useful idiots and the public at large that Trump needed to be defeated at all costs. This is so thoroughly established by thousands of hours of DNC propaganda that if you deny this fact then you are simply proving to us — yet again — that it is in your best interests to lie about this fact because you want to continue to attempt to a55a55inate Trump. You are an unhinged lunatic, a cultist, a threat to yourself and others, and are evil. The DNC clearly still wants to a55a55inate Trump, and tumblefag's continued psychosis here is a sobering proof of this. This nation is not safe while tumblefag-types have the franchise, political office, access to the bureaucracies, and access to banking and finance. |
tumbleweed
the wanderer | Mon Jul 22 21:31:50 hmmm.., now who can’t read the others posts... (or way to duck or misunderstand everything) “ Regime media repeatedly and openly referred to Trump as "a threat to our democracy", cast him as a "dictator”” ... yet zero indication that was relevant to the shooters motive, in fact so far looks not to be... anyway, carry on with the rabbits |
Cherub Cow
Member | Mon Jul 22 22:57:06 [tumblefag (probably pedophile)]: "“ Regime media repeatedly and openly referred to Trump as "a threat to our democracy", cast him as a "dictator”” ... yet zero indication that was relevant to the shooters motive, in fact so far looks not to be..." You're still too retarded to read. You're such an abysmal dumb fuck that you would require a manifesto that directly says, "[I'm doing this because the media brainwashed me.]" That's how fucking retarded you are. But you are an ideological clone of this shooter. You suffer the same psychosis. *You* are the evidence. |
Cherub Cow
Member | Mon Jul 22 23:44:29 Other highlights from the Hearing: • 25:00ish — Bolshevik Raskin predictably pivots from condemning the attack to making this an opportunity to push for an assault-weapons ban to stop "weapons of war" (the fucking gun-grabbing faggot). Whenever he has time, he is sure to emphasize that the shooter was using "his father's AR-15", since Raskin is trying to score political points off of the a55a55ination attempt of his political rival. He also is sure to mention that the shooter was initially identified via the serial number of his rifle, which he takes a moment to mention would be a useful requirement (more gun-grabbing faggotry). • 51:30ish — Jim Jordan asks about Secret Service requests for additional manpower. Director Cheatle only claims that the Secret Service denying requests for additional help does not indicate that security was compromised but does not explain how that can be so. Without revealing specifically what was denied, she can get away with truth or lies in this scenario. • 56:30 — Rep. Norton tries to deflect to gun violence. She uses the gun-grabber logic of "mass shooter's gun of choice". More lies and deflections. All she asks is whether or not disarming law-abiding people will make it easier for a tyranny to occur — but she's speaking of this tyranny as a positive (the coward's logic of "safety"). • 1:03:00ish — Rep. Turner talks about threat assessment but uses it as a means to talk about the threat of Iran (Turner is an Israel shill, so talking about Iran serves Israel's want to attack Iran). There has been some chatter about the possibility that the shooter was helped by a foreign government since Crooks was in possession of some signals kit that would be difficult for people to acquire and difficult for a 20-year-old to even know about, but I am not convinced by this. Crooks could literally just Google "ways to trigger devices remotely" or something and find that equipment. But Turner focuses on Iran's threat assessment as a way to call out the Secret Service for not being prepared for an even greater threat than Crooks. • 1:10:00ish — Rep. Lynch's (obvious Democrat) questions are clearly trying to steer towards more gun-grabber idiocy. He stupidly and ignorant claims that the shooter had extra "clips" (it's "magazines", dumb fuck) and claims that those "clips" meant that the shooter could have "mowed down" the entire Secret Service detachment. This is retarded logic because it has no concept of return fire. This is a common leftist stupidity. He goes on to claim that it was a Secret Service error to keep Trump contained while the shooter was neutralized, because, again, he is so retarded that he thinks that an "AR-15" can just make "quick work" of the Secret Service shield. The monumental retardation of this is that he is essentially suggesting that the Secret Service should have tried to run Trump off the stage while the shooter was still active — but this would have put Trump in *more* danger. Maliciously evil fucks like this want to remove weapons from law-abiding people. • 1:14:00 — Director Cheatle fields questions from Rep. Foxx about why she was hired and why she refuses to resign despite failure. • 1:19:00ish — Rep. Connolly congratulates the Secret Service for their other successes and pivots to the Democrat wish for gun-grabbing, claiming that fewer guns would make the Secret Service's job easier (delusional nonsense). He further claims that if the Secret Service Director does not agree with his want to disarm lawful Americans that she is unfit for office (i.e., *that* is his imperative — *not* that she should not be in office after failing to protect Trump). This is becoming a theme among the Democrats: they do *not* want to criticize the Secret Service except in very limited and dutiful theater. This is effectively further admission that they would *prefer* that the Secret Service had *failed*. • 1:27:00 — Rep. Grothman asks the DEI question. Director Cheatle has previously said — openly and directly — that she has been intentionally increasing the DEI presence within the Secret Service. She here claims that she is hiring the "best", but her DEI claim contradicts this as does her belief that *she* is the "best" (a claim she made earlier to Rep. Foxx). In other words, in *her* language she believes that DEI candidates *are* the best — not in actuality but in her preference for DEI. It's like a hammer-lover saying that a hammer makes the "best" shovel. • 1:32:00 — Rep. Krishnamoorthi asks how it is that the Secret Service did not stop the rally despite a threat being known for about 2 minutes. Director Cheatle says that they are investigating communications to determine what was known. Director Cheatle also answers here that there is no indication of foreign staging of this shooting. • 1:38:00 — Rep. Cloud points out what I've said before: Bolsheviks such as this Secret Service director organize bureaucracies so that accountability is shielded. Rep. Cloud simply wants to know which Secret Service billet is ultimately responsible for an event's security plan, and Director Cheatle says that there are overlapping realms of responsibility. This sounds good to sebbish faggots and people who might pretend that she's talking about overlapping sectors of fire, but we're talking about bureaucracy. It is in the best interests of a Bolshevik organization to remove accountability for any one figure. This is a self-cycling design, since bureaucracies formed in this way encourage no one to claim responsibility, since anyone who claims responsibility can be removed as a scapegoat. This means that those who survive an accountability purge are more likely to bury themselves behind bureaucratic protections (i.e., the system selects for cowards). Cloud also has a funny joke here. He points out that Director Cheatle is a champion for Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility, and that Cheatle has accomplished the "accessibility part". • 1:41:30 — Rep. Ro Khanna (a Democrat crook who supports ESG) reads a generic "condemn violence" statement and surprisingly calls for Cheatle's resignation. • 1:46:00 — Rep. Palmer also asks about the Iran threat assessment. Unlike Rep. Turner, Palmer's focus is entirely on how the Iran threat assessment should have boosted security (as opposed to Turner wanting to talk about Iran as an enemy). • 1:59:30 — Rep. Higgins also calls out the "shell game". • 2:14:00 — Rep. Biggs admits to the record a series of DNC calls to violence against Trump. • 2:18:00 — Rep. Brown starts with a generic statement on opposing political violence, then immediately pivots to January 6th and Pelosi, congratulates the Secret Service, and asks easy questions that gives her an excuse to blame "gun violence". You don't have to guess their political parties. They're all on the same script. • 2:21:00 — Bolshevik Raskin again. • 2:25:00 — Nancy Mace's questions. She accuses Cheatle of intentionally leaking her opening statement to news outlets. Some people clipped this because Mace says, "Shit," twice. It's mostly theater. • 2:31:00 — The Bolshevik Rep. Stansbury, who is a sustainability commissar who fervently supported the Party Doctrine of ESG at the ESG Hearings, predictably makes this about gun-grabbing. Her only real point is that citizens should not be allowed to purchase ammunition, and that no one should have access to "military style" weapons. These people are shameless. • 2:39:00ish — Rep. Laturner asks why Cheatle is unwilling to reveal even undisputed facts that she clearly knows. She stonewalls. • 2:42:00 — Rep. Frost (another idiot who just supports whatever they tell him to support) barely cares about the obviously coordinated talking point about condemning political violence. None of them believe it. He asks generic questions. • 2:48:00 — Rep. Fallon asks the foreign adversary question (i.e., if a 20-year-old broke security, how is the Secret Service equipped for professionals). He reveals that Cheatle has still not personally gone to the actual site. He hits harder than the others on the "sloped roof" mistake that Cheatle previously made. The other Reps gave her more distance on this since she expressed that she was previously talking out of her ass. • 2:52:30 — Rep. Lee lies about a "culture of violence" for her angle. To her credit, she asks how it's acceptable for Cheatle to avoid answering any questions for her stated investigation-estimate of 60 days, but she immediately undermines this by asking the same question as Rep. Connolly (i.e., would disarming Americans make it easier for the government to establish a benevolent tyranny). • 2:59:00 — Rep. Donalds asks some repeat questions about what the failure point was. The unity on the "resign" talking points from the Democrats is making me very suspicious of their motives. It is possible that removing her during the investigation would allow the FBI more leeway to remove incriminating evidence or otherwise control the narrative. Deputy Director Ronald L. Rowe Jr. does not have any red flags that show a Regime victory if he takes Cheatle's place, so it may just be fake outrage from the DNC. • 3:03:00 — Rep. Goldman (Bolshevik) stumbles through more retardation. He then drops a retardedly transparent line that is even more egregious than the other faggots: 3:08:30 "[Texas Rep.] recreated the shooting twice with an AR-15 and ... [hit] 15 out of 16 shots. I don't know why that doesn't convince him that we should get rid of AR-15s ... and weapons of war." The absolute fucking retard. Because you can hit things with a rifle, rifles should be banned? Imagine being this retarded. Tumbletard knows. • 3:09:00 — Rep. Timmons asks about FBI updates. He is able to get confirmation that Crooks is believed to have acted alone (Cheatle previously waffled on this question). Cheatle again claims that all assets requested that day were received, but this obfuscates what others revealed, which is that they had been denied assets so regularly that they just stopped asking. Timmons is the first to ask about Crooks' detonator device. Timmons also asks a very obvious question that contradicts DEI: Trump is tall. Short DEI hires are not tall enough to cover his body, and yet, multiple short DEI hires were seen attempting to protect Trump. Cheatle takes this personally since she is short, saying that her agents are "perfectly capable" (so she's delusional). • 3:15:00 — Rep. Moskowitz (Bolshevik) actually makes a decent point despite being a Bolshevik who supports ESG: after the Uvalde shooting, the police department insulated itself from accountability with the same Bolshevik strategy and assigned no blame. This tactic was undermined by the governor firing the police chief. He's using this to intimidate Cheatle, but he's also revealing solutions to Bolshevism. Cheatle is asked if she would have resigned if Trump had been killed, and she deflects. Moskowitz then asks the same bullshit question about the disarming of Americans making benevolent tyranny easier, and he gets Cheatle to say, "Yes," by changing the variable from AR-15s to RPGs. Cheatle is weak. • 3:27:00 — Tlaib does not even bother condemning political violence. She immediately talks about mass-shootings instead. She fakes being emotional while listing various shootings, even throwing in the word "racist" for extra cred among the mental weaklings. "I immediately thought of the children." lol! "Weapons of war." lol! Her testimony is easily the most retarded so far. • 3:32:00 — Rep. Burchett asks about Secret Service occupying the building that Crooks used. He calls Cheatle a "DEI horror story." • 3:37:30 — Rep. Crockett appears in a comically absurd costume and asks Cheatle if this was the result of DEI. Cheatle is somehow able to say that it is not, even though she cannot answer anything else so confidently. So she is lying. Crockett very racistly emphasizes "young White male" in order to lie about the Secret Service perhaps not challenging Crooks because of his race. This is directly contradicted by the evidence. We know that Crooks was being watched for suspicion, the question is only why Secret Service failed to address the known threat. Crockett then deflects to mass shootings and open-carry, since she is clearly trying to disarm law-abiding Americans because she — like all of the other Democrats in this hearing — are traitors. Crockett does admit that people in Congress have indeed been calling for political violence and escalating violent rhetoric. Surprisingly, she does not immediately pivot this as blame on the GOP, so she actually spoke the truth. She, like AOC, reiterates the issue of political retribution. • 3:43:00 — Marjorie Greene asks about the agent in charge of the site. She has some fun questions mixed in here, ending with a question about whether or not there was a conspiracy within the Secret Service to a55a55inate Trump. • 3:50:30 — Rep. Pressley starts with some retarded shit about gun violence and how no one should be afraid (this is weak people logic; some people *should* be afraid, such as Bolshevik anti-American political leaders). She then talks about DEI and how it's totally cool even though she herself is a representative of it being a total and monumental failure. She then lies about women in the Secret Service having to meet the same standards (they do not). She even shoe-horns Project 2025, lol. • 3:53:00 — Rep. Raskin again. He hilariously seems to "compliment" the retards that go before him, but it's almost like he's saying it ironically, like, "[I know that you're a fucking retard, but I'll give you an especially large amount of praise so that it looks like I don't think you're a retard, but actually the praise is so over-the-top that I'm subtly revealing that you're my retarded golem]." Raskin then deflects to other "mass shootings". Then he talks about disarming citizens. More deflection. These people are evil. • 3:58:00 — Rep. McClain mentions the "shell game" and is able to get Cheatle to reveal that Cheatle is fully briefed on the FBI's investigation (she even knows how many shell casings were on the roof and what explosives were in the vehicle) but is intentionally hiding behind "refer you to the FBI" so that she does not have to answer questions. • 4:02:30 — Rep. Boebert continues McClain's line of questioning, beginning with the knowledge that Cheatle does indeed know. Cheatle says that she apologized to Trump personally for the Secret Service's failure. Boebert asks for Cheatle's personal texts and calls. Boebert points out that regular people saw Crooks as particularly suspicious but Secret Service and police did not approach him. Boebert asks if the Secret Service had anyone on the water tower. This may be because people were circulating clips of the water tower that (to them) appeared to have a person on it. This was obviously a shadow, but retards gonna retard. Cheatle at least answers this directly and puts that on the record. Boebert asks again about the slanted roof, but Cheatle deflects to a general statement about overwatch. • 4:10:20 — Rep. Fry mentions the Secret Service's failure with Jake Sullivan and others, showing a pattern of failure. He asks about communications, but this is all open source knowledge so he's wasting time. Fry is able to get Cheatle to admit that Crooks became especially suspicious 5 minutes before the first shot and was confirmed as a kill shot seconds before. • 4:17:30 — Rep. Luna asks for names and numbers. Cheatle here at least admits that it's her personal belief that Crooks acted alone (she previously defaulted to the FBI on that). Luna rightly points out that Cheatle may have perjured herself at this point. She definitely looks worn out and has been providing slightly more honest answers towards the end. • 4:22:30 — Rep. Langworthy mentions that he went to the site himself. This is funny because Cheatle has not. He basically just torches Cheatle and points out, as others have done, that no one has been punished in any way for this failure. • 4:27:10 — Rep. Burlison asks about responsibility and guidelines. He asks about encrypted apps and whether or not Cheatle uses them. Cheatle admits to carrying both work and personal phones. • 4:33:30 — Rep. Waltz asks about claims that Mayorkas denied increased security for Trump. He reveals that Secret Service came to him personally to tell him that "for years" additional protection requests were denied. He shows that Mayorkas lied by obfuscation, that Cheatle is similarly lying by obfuscation, and that Anthony Guglielmi also lied. In reality, the Secret Service was asking for additional resources but those resources were denied, forcing them to patch security vulnerabilities as best as they could. They were set up for failure. Waltz points out the total lack of press conferences by SS, FBI, and others. • 4:42:00 — Rep. Comer admits more material into the record. Raskin closes. He talks about bipartisan support for resignation before just talking about gun violence in general like a good Bolshevik. "Weapons of mass destruction" lol. Comer: "There's never accountability in this administration." Exactly. The summary of summaries: • The DNC largely attempted to not care about the a55a55ination attempt at all and instead blamed this on "mass shooters" so as to posture for gun-grabbing. • The DNC clearly wishes that the shooter had been successful, and they condone political violence against their enemies. • Director Cheatle was slowly worn down by the end and admitted that she knows specific details and has been briefed by the FBI but was hiding these details from the committee. • Awards for biggest retards go to Reps Connolly, Lynch, Goldman, Crockett, Pressley, and Tlaib. • Lynch's testimony is hilarious since he has no fucking clue what he's talking about. • Tlaib's testimony is hilarious because she can't act and didn't bother pretending to be against gun violence. So just remember that if a president gets a55a55inated you'll hear modern Democrats calling to disarm American citizens. That's the level of retardation we have achieved under Bolshevism. |
tumbleweed
the wanderer | Mon Jul 22 23:48:53 so anyone who has ever talked about Trump was conspiring to get 1 nut after 8 years to finally try to take him out (even though done merely as a fairly random political target) makes total sense & even though it does NOT appear to be this guy's motive... you believe it's media/dems/thinking-people who have corruptly painted Trump as bad, whereas for AOC (& every other target you have on the left) it's their own fault for their behavior... Trump's been perfect... no way he caused any negative views of himself... face it, by your logic this was a Trump assassination attempt on himself by putting out his idiocy for years, including desperately wanting media attention daily & thus gaining notice of this nutter... |
Cherub Cow
Member | Mon Jul 22 23:56:57 [tumblefag (TDS bot, likely pederast)]: "so anyone who has ever talked about Trump was conspiring to get 1 nut after 8 years to finally try to take him out (even though done merely as a fairly random political target)" Do we see how tumblefag can only produce straw man arguments? He can only speak in lies and subversion. At no point can he directly address my actual stated claims. Again: "The DNC clearly still wants to a55a55inate Trump, and tumblefag's continued psychosis here is a sobering proof of this. This nation is not safe while tumblefag-types have the franchise, political office, access to the bureaucracies, and access to banking and finance." |
jergul
large member | Tue Jul 23 01:58:43 CC You have in no way established the DNC wants to assassinate Trump and Tumbleweed will not replace you. |
Cherub Cow
Member | Tue Jul 23 02:12:04 "We know — for a fact — that Regime media provoked the a55a55ination against Trump. It was their goal, and they nearly delivered on their overt goal. Regime media repeatedly and openly referred to Trump as "a threat to our democracy", cast him as a "dictator", lied about him being a "fascist", lied about him being "[Hitler 2.0]", and used all manner of absurd and delusional propaganda to justify in the minds of their useful idiots and the public at large that Trump needed to be defeated at all costs. This is so thoroughly established by thousands of hours of DNC propaganda that if you deny this fact then you are simply proving to us — yet again — that it is in your best interests to lie about this fact because you want to continue to attempt to a55a55inate Trump. You are an unhinged lunatic, a cultist, a threat to yourself and others, and are evil." |
Cherub Cow
Member | Tue Jul 23 02:55:35 Collection of some of the DNC's calls for violence: http://x.com/AmandaMilius/status/1812279400034976047 |
Seb
Member | Tue Jul 23 03:13:44 "Any given population has a Normal Distribution of sanity. Psychosis propaganda is designed to increase the threshold of what people can rationalize to such an extent that the fringe elements of the Normal Distribution can no longer stand the propaganda and are pushed into action." This is an interesting projection that tells us a lot about how CC thinks. What most people do in this situation is not leap into action, it is switch off and disengage in a form of learned incapacity. Cf. How it has been used in Russia: nothing is true, everything is possible etc. |
Seb
Member | Tue Jul 23 03:14:36 Indeed much as the easiest thing to do with insane pseudo rationalisations one encounters here. |
jergul
large member | Tue Jul 23 03:20:40 CC I think it ultimately is in my best interests to make some popcorn and enjoy the spectacle. Your election, not mine. |
Cherub Cow
Member | Tue Jul 23 04:29:07 [sebfag (actual retard, likely pederast)]: "What most people do in this situation is not leap into action, it is switch off and disengage in a form of learned incapacity. Cf. How it has been used in Russia: nothing is true, everything is possible etc." Seb literally too low-IQ to realize that he just fell into an obvious error — failing to correctly rationalize a Gaussian distribution. There's even a meme about this: http://x.com/ichthys30/status/1807961469469794388 If you're a pathetically low-IQ person such as sebfag, and someone says, "Most Indians are short," sebfag will respond by saying, "[Not all Indians are short. I know a really tall Indian girl.]" This demonstrates how pathetically low-IQ the sebfag is because it was already built into the statement that not *all* Indians are short — that it's a matter of *many* or *most* being short across a distribution. But, sebfag cannot reconcile multi-state conditions, so he must piss and shit his diaper and respond to one state at the expense of the others. This is why you can never get him to understand that black people are lower-IQ than White people; he will always break into the "[but exception!]" logic. He cannot rationalize multiple inputs simultaneously. In this case, sebtard failed to realize that it is the *bulk* of the Gaussian distribution that continues to behave somewhat rationally during psychosis propaganda — *not* being provoked into violence. I stated this clearly in my above writeup, but sebtard was too fucking stupid and illiterate to recognize that he just repeated a fragment of what I already said while — in his intellectual stupor — believing that he'd extracted some insightful proof of my "projection". You can be assured that any time that sebtard thinks he's discovered something clever, it is only because he stumbled into a colossal error that will further demonstrate his abysmal retardation. Again, sebtard is illiterate. If I wanted to correct sebtard's illiteracy, I would be forced to break this simple Gaussian concept into even more explicit thought bubbles — and he would still fail to rationalize them. For instance, simplified thought bubbles that sebtard still will not understand: • Psychosis propaganda is directed as a leftist normal distribution • Most people will accept the propaganda, repeat the lies, and vote as commanded • As propaganda increases, the general level of insanity within the population increases — across a distribution • It is within rare elements across the distribution that individual and rare people will be so overcome with the propaganda that they feel a direct need to take action. These are MK Ultra candidates. They possess the right combination of variables such as easily brainwashed, irrational, impulsive, capable of planning, psychotic, isolated. This is totally wasted on sebfag. I could explain this a hundred different ways and he would still say some retard shit about how, "[hur hur,] What most people do in this situation is not leap into action [hur hur! I am not tarded at all! hur hur!]" It really is fucking sad. He's a fucking retard. |
jergul
large member | Tue Jul 23 05:19:37 CC What has probably happened is a Gaussian distribution transformation. Driven mainly by the Flynn effect and its reverse. Remember, there is actually only quite a small demographic with peak intelligence (happily, my demographic, but we all knew that at some level). A demographic walled in by Hot Rods on once side and The Children's on another (HR worked in accounting most of his life. He was among the smarter of his generation). Populism thrives when people are dumber. What we are seeing is politics degrading to 1905-1955 levels of strong faith in strong leadership with the vilification of the opposition. Because only evil ignorance can explain pigheaded unwillingness to see things the correct way. I suggest eating cake. Or maybe popcorn. Most of the globe is still getting smarter thanks to Flynn anyway. The reverse effect is for the golden billion. |
jergul
large member | Tue Jul 23 19:28:53 Thankfully, I am the CC anectdote. TTT |
Cherub Cow
Member | Fri Jul 26 00:11:23 Ugh, Trump actually believes that Iran is trying to a55a55inate him: http://x.com/NickJFuentes/status/1816535930100154805 No, it was not Iran. It was the DNC. Israel *wants* the U.S. to attack Iran. Israel has wanted this for *decades*. |
Cherub Cow
Member | Fri Jul 26 23:21:08 Andrew Torba, CEO of Gab: ----------- "Approximately 30 minutes ago, Gab learned that Thomas Crooks, the deranged Joe Biden supporter who attempted to assassinate President Donald Trump, may have had an account on our platform. We are unable to confirm that the account in question actually belonged to him. The account was last active on the site in 2021. As far as we are aware, the account did not use the site to send any direct messages. He posted on the site nine (9) times total. While the account made very few posts on the site, the majority of them were in support of President Biden. A number of posts in particular expressed support for President Biden's COVID lockdowns, border policies and executive orders. We have saved the account data pending receipt of a search warrant. [12:34 July 24th, 2024] http://x.com/BasedTorba/status/1816180238918824255 ----------- "Some more context: the reason we know is because we received an emergency disclosure request from a law enforcement agency." http://x.com/BasedTorba/status/1816244866365411739 ----------- The nine messages from "epicMicrowave" do indicate left-wing talking points, including: http://gab.com/epicMicrowave/comments • "illegal immigrants are not criminals" • "[immigrants] show lower rates of crime" • ""so yes more people votes for [Trump] but thats a result of larger turnout not a genuine increase in popularity" • "Actually the executive order allows an easier path to US citizenship therefore no longer making them illegals" • "The reason all the deaths are down is because you are in stick in your house." • "However [Biden's] order doesn't actually open borders or reduce the authority of border patrol" • "Im sorry explain to me how trump was ever concerned with what the left wanted, or anybody in the GOP for that matter?" That last comment was in response to Torba saying this in 2021: "It's astonishing how quickly the left wields power when they get it. 40+ executive orders. Total domination of committees in Congress. Pressuring the Supreme Court to do their bidding. Absolutely incredible. The right should learn from this. When the right gets power we tip toe around appeasing the left and not making them mad. The left doesn't care. They stomp all over us with no regard to our thoughts on the matter. The right needs to learn this lesson. Now." In other words, Crooks' assumption was that neither Trump nor the GOP care about the left, which is false, but it is a particularly leftist belief that the right does not care about the left. The reality is that the left is so embedded in the prestige networks that many if not most GOP politicians — including Trump — tried to appease the CNN crowd so the right would seem "reasonable". This is the nature of the GOP merely being the DNC going the speed limit; the slave revolt keeps swimming left. The left, of course, completely disagrees with this and vehemently fights against the possibility, which, again, exposes them. tumblefag, for instance, would very likely pretend that Trump has never compromised — even if he knew that this exposes him as a leftist. He simply could not help it. TLDR: • Gab was contacted by "a law enforcement agency" to release information about Gab user epicMicrowave in connection with the Crooks investigation. • User epicMicrowave spouted left-wing talking points in his few comments, including support for the global totalitarian Regime during COVID, hatred of Trump, and hatred for right-wing border policies. |
Seb
Member | Sat Jul 27 15:59:13 CC: "Psychosis propaganda is designed to increase the threshold" Then you are talking about the top tail not the bottom tail and mean "decrease" not "increase". Having a PhD in physics dealing with stochastic turbulent structures and being intuitively familiar with all sorts of distribution it is obvious that when you refer to an increasing threshold to increase the proportion of the population affected, the threshold must be below the mode of the distribution. I suppose if I had thought a bit more from your perspective, I suppose it would be obvious you used incorrect language, but who wants to spend inhabiting the absolute sewer that's your mentality. |
Nimatzo
iChihuaha | Sat Jul 27 16:41:57 Apparently, comprehending CC's statement is beyond someone with a PhD in physics and familiar with Gaussian distributions. Who knew? This type of pedantry while boasting about deep knowledge on the very thing you trip over, because someone used the wrong word is actually the hallmark of a midwit. Nhill comes to mind as to exact opposite, he managed to have conversations, despite being *literally* autistic, and me using the wrong technical jargon. |
Seb
Member | Sat Jul 27 19:28:59 Nim: Hush, of which you do not understand, do not speak. |
Cherub Cow
Member | Sat Jul 27 22:38:09 sebfag once again showing that he does not have the literacy to chime in since it just leads to more brain diarrhea. He misread my initial post, shit the bed, got called out, and is now attempting to recover with more diaper-shitting about his academic non-achievement in faggotry — and *still* fails to understand my point since he is *still* making a category error! As I told williamthecoward: little bitchboys like this are just proving that academia is largely pushing through total fucking idiots. sebtard is *not* the exception where someone smart and capable was rightly drawn to academia; he instead is an example of a total fucking idiot who was pushed through academia in the same way that people will make the class retard into Homecoming King because they think it's funny. |
Seb
Member | Sun Jul 28 09:24:11 No, I read your initial post just fine. In any case you've missed the central thrust of my argument, which is empirically that the psychological response to what you call psychosis propoganda isn't to lower the threshold (that you erroneously referred to as raising) at which the top tail engages in violent action, it's actually to raise the lower threshold where the lower tail disengages completely from politics in a form of learned incapacity. Your inability to clearly communicate your incorrect theories of propoganda is very much a you problem not a me problem. |
Cherub Cow
Member | Sun Jul 28 13:10:50 [Sebtard (retarded dipshit)]: "No, I read your initial post just fine." No, you absolutely did not. If you understood what I said at even a 3rd grade reading level then you wouldn't be shitting the bed yet again. I have never seen you engage with a steel-man argument because you are literally too retarded to do so. This thread is about the deranged would-be Trump a55a55in who was activated by left-wing psychosis propaganda. Contribute or get the fuck out — no one has ever wanted your retarded pilpul, you absolute faggot. |
Seb
Member | Sun Jul 28 14:51:15 Yes, and I'm saying your nonsense about "left wing psychosis propoganda" is not only a hallucination, it is also something that cannot work in real life. Far more likely given the Epstein releases he was driven by the right wing QAnon stuff. |
Nimatzo
iChihuaha | Sun Jul 28 18:54:51 Information can not radicalize people. -Seb |
Seb
Member | Sun Jul 28 19:35:51 Nim: Awwww bless. |
Seb
Member | Sun Jul 28 19:36:41 Any information inevitably drives people insane. -Nim |
Seb
Member | Sun Jul 28 19:37:13 Oh look, turns out we can both be retards! Only one of us is acting though. |
Cherub Cow
Member | Mon Aug 05 21:28:40 "A sitting Democrat [Jamie Raskin (Bolshevik, MD)] made it clear that he and his colleagues intended to overturn the election and prepare for civil war after a failed attempt to murder Trump" http://x.com/AuronMacintyre/status/1820586157823984085 As a reminder, this is the same Raskin who wants to abolish the Electoral College (allowing Bolshevik totalitarianism), who wants to create a new law making it so that the VP merely holds a ceremonial role at the Elector count (thus allowing uncontested fraud), who "conveniently" protected Ray Epps, and who pretended that Antifa is "just an idea" and that White Supremacists are the FBI's biggest issue (falsifying threats using a captured DoJ). So here he is transparently giving away the DNC's stated plan: *if* Trump wins in *2024*, the DNC will begin falsifying "insurrection" claims for *2020* to remove Trump from power. Again, this is what the DNC means by "our democracy". It is not about whether or not the people decide on a candidate; it is whether or not the Bolsheviks *want* that candidate. If they cannot control Trump, they'll control Vance or Johnson. Even though retards such as tumblefag think that Vance is some kind of "far right" threat, he's an Israel shill, so the Bolsheviks actually prefer him to Trump since Trump seems to be taking Israel donor money but would probably do what he wants once in office. So the Regime just used massive propaganda campaigns to create Manchurian Candidates to a55a55inate Trump, and, since that may not pay off (though they're certainly hoping for more attempts), their backup plan is to create civil war conditions in 2025. |
Cherub Cow
Member | Mon Aug 12 06:06:27 To post some details for posterity: Brandon Herrera video shows the absurdity of the ear-shot being intentional and also demonstrates the effect of a high-caliber weapon on a skull: [July 20th, 2024] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FsvJzfXZI18 Gerand Thumb did the same: [July 21st, 2024] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZtJA9xuzAFE Some of the details that they were working with were not even correct at the time they released the video, but they had the key details correct. Also note that those test dummies they use tend to exaggerate gore, so even though high-caliber weapons were why Crooks was bleeding from his nose and mouth (which I pointed out previously), the skin and skull tend to minimize the appearance of these things on the outside. This is from late July but has some additional details regarding the shooting itself: "NEW Video Cops Engaging Trump Shooter, Spotted 90 MIN Prior" [jeffostroff; July 29th, 2024] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l--e2LykRIQ It draws from this video: "Trump Rally - Butler, PA. 07/13/24. Extended Cut" [Dayve Stewert; July 28th, 2024] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28lxF9LONGk Short version is that police knew of the shooter 90 minutes before the shooting. An officer who was expecting that he was ending his shift forwarded images of the shooter to his unit. In the minutes before the shooting, you can see that police were attempting to surround the building and get to the roof (footage shows the view from between the shooter and Trump). Police (apparently) did not have communication with Secret Service to warn them to remove Trump from the stage. Broken communication was a major factor. In other words, Secret Service had a major working gap in this area and were not responding to communications from police within that area. :| This video uses a drone to plot the shooter's route: [Spa Guy; August 6th, 2024] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SEaebA741ds The commentary in this video is absolute garbage since this guy is speculating about evidence that he cannot assign to the shooter (e.g., most of the prints on the roof probably came from investigators; the drone footage would be way too late to the scene to claim that interesting details were all from the shooter). But, the video itself is useful because you can see that the shooter • parked his van down the street, • walked to a table with a backpack (where his photo was taken), • waited (probably seeking a moment when he felt he could get away with scaling the roof), • went to a low point entry onto one roof, and • then had to run across a bunch of rooves to get to his final position. • At some point along the roof he assembled his weapon from his backpack. Police may have been bottle-necked while looking for access points to the roof, with evidence of this being that the shooter apparently pointed his weapon at an officer who attempted to access the roof. This would explain other officers moving at ground level to spot him. (Typically, tactical thinking has people try to flow around bottlenecks to find other vantage points that are useful — i.e., find wherever "work" can be done.) It was previously speculated that a different access point was used by the shooter: "NEW Evidence: How Trump Shooter Got On Roof" [[jeffostroff; July 30th, 2024] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WpteCECuDoM ..but this previous speculation doesn't account for the FBI removing part of the shooter's actual route for their evidence-processing. There was also some speculation about the shooter using a bike, but the cyclist was someone else with a backpack who was identified and interviewed. This video has better route-mapping and shows some of these concrete details: "Trump Shooter Running On Roof NEW VIEW Police Bodycam" [jeffostroff; August 11th, 2024] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vhjrC1wzJG4 So, anyways, it has now been about a month since the DNC successfully incited a left-wing psychosis victim to attempt to a55a55inate their primary opposition following the dementia/Parkinson's meltdown of their Biden puppet at the Trump/Biden debate. Recall that after failing to have Trump killed, the DNC removed Biden in favor of an Indian woman who blew her way into power and calls herself "black" to encourage voter turnout among black people. Incidentally, if the DNC had succeeded, Nimarata Randhawa (another Indian) would likely have been the GOP candidate, which I warned about before the a55a55ination (i.e., I warned that DeSantis dropping out would put the a55a55ination play in motion for Randhawa). Hilariously, sites such as Imgur are still openly getting news and strategy from New Republic, which infamously timed a Trump-as-Hitler cover very soon before the a55a55ination attempt: http://imgur.com/gallery/what-crybaby-weirdo-iDUahuG So, if you think that the DNC attempting to a55a55inate its political opponent through propaganda resulted in soul-searching and a return to principles... nope. Bolshevism can only continue to destroy. Their only regret is that the shooter was not successful, and one of their hopes is that another will try. These people have no conscience and even now are blasting the echo chambers with warnings of "Christo-Fascism" — admitting their guilt in the process. |
Cherub Cow
Member | Tue Aug 13 07:24:04 Very good point: --------------- "Trump would be wise to remove from his Secret Service team anyone who says they believe the Fine People Hoax that is being spread by Biden and the Harris campaign right now. Get it in writing. Ideally, you want a Secret Service team that has more incentive to keep you alive than to let someone “kill Hitler.” I would also demand the current head of Secret Service issue a public confirmation that they know the Fine People Hoax is debunked. If not satisfied, use private security." http://x.com/ScottAdamsSays/status/1823064931622850743 --------------- |
Cherub Cow
Member | Tue Aug 13 09:13:27 The Secret Service sniper who stopped the shooter appears on BodyCam with his spotter here: "Meet Secret Service Snipers Who Killed Trump Shooter BWC2-122104" [jeffostroff; August 12th, 2024] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r19kMYf49KQ In the early hours after the shooting, a lot of people (e.g., Gerand Thumb) incorrectly assessed that the sniper team appearing behind Trump in the ground footage (i.e., to Trump's NorthWest) were the ones who took the shot, but it was the team to his SouthEast, since they had a view that was not obscured by the trees. This caused some issues by more retarded conspiracy-slingers about "[Why didn't they shoot sooner?]", with the answer being, "[Because the snipers you're seeing in that video had their view obscured by trees and were not the ones who fired]." The video also includes footage of when this SouthEast SS team were alerted to the commotion on the "AGR International" building's rooves and adjusted position from observing the South to observing the AGR rooves to their North (18:10:10 local time). The shooter fired his first shot at about 18:11:35 local time, so that means this SS team observed the rooves for about one minute and 20 seconds, which was the time spent by the shooter running across the rooves and then low-crawling up the final roof. From this team's vantage point, Crooks' head would not have been visible until the moment he began firing, so they reacted on sight within about 5 – 9 seconds. Trump reported yesterday that the team gained sight of the shooter via muzzle flash (1:01:10 in his discussion with Musk: http://x.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1823144316014911820 ). So again this goes to communication between the Secret Service and local police, with the AGR building being a major oversight when it came to sectors of fire. (The Secret Service largely left that area to police control but did not have good communication with the police.) Director Cheatle "corrected" the record regarding her early claim that counter-snipers were not deployed to this AGR roof due to the roof's pitch presenting a safety issue (her early claim here: The Hill; July 16th, 2024 https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/4776617-secret-service-director-assassination-attempt-roof/ ), but her "correction" was merely that safety was *part* of the decision-making process (and this is if you steel-man her position). The result, of course, of not assigning personnel to the roof itself is a major non-coverage of that sector — personnel shortage being itself another issue. Some reports even state that a sniper unit was *within* the AGR building behind Crooks but that those windows do not have a sight-line to the rooves there. These sorts of issues are obvious to spacially aware security planners, so the question is why people without spacial awareness are promoted within the SS, and DEI largely answers that question. |
Cherub Cow
Member | Mon Aug 19 00:56:35 Further developments regarding the DNC's successful provocation (via mass-formation psychosis propaganda) of an a55a55ination attempt against their chief political rival: 2 days ago there were videos regarding Representative Clay Higgins' visit to Pennsylvania for his own personal investigations: [jeffostroff; August 16th, 2024] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=af_K1oGfljM Higgins released his report here, though the above video does a good job visualizing the information: [Official House dot Gov page of Clay Higgins; August 15th, 2024] http://clayhiggins.house.gov/2024/08/15/higgins-releases-preliminary-investigative-report/ Major details are that Higgins finds outright negligence concerning the US Secret Service's (USSS's) interfacing with local police. USSS was supposed to pick up radios so that local police could interact with them, but apparently the USSS largely neglected to do so. It sounds like they only interacted with police leadership, which means that police had to work things up their own chain-of-command in order to have anything relayed via Police leadership to USSS leadership, which is an obvious oversight given how quickly events develop. There *does* seem to be *some* cross-chatter, though, given that the USSS Sniper Teams had about 1:20 (min:ss) (minus twelve seconds, explained below) of warning to focus on the AGR rooves. Worse, though, is that Higgins revealed that it was actually an on-the-ground Police SWAT member who disabled the shooter. The 9th shot belonged to this Police SWAT member — not the USSS — and that shot damaged the rifle of the shooter and injured him. There is a pause after this SWAT shooter's shot, followed by another round, and it is *that* final round that came from USSS, killing the shooter. This technically means that the USSS killed an injured shooter who was no longer a threat — basically cleaning up the Police SWAT member's work. This has given new room to conspiracy theorists, who are claiming a "Jack Ruby" situation of the shooter being cleaned up to avoid further testimony. I.e., the SWAT member's shot may have allowed Crooks to be questioned, whereas the USSS' kill shot silenced him. The pause between the SWAT member's shot and the USSS shot gives minor credibility to this, as does the fact that the USSS were using high-powered scopes and binoculars which may well have been able to determine the state of Crooks' weapon and his health. Taking away from the theory, though, is how quickly this happened. From the USSS' good-faith perspective, even though shots had ceased, USSS would still want to be sure that the shooter was no longer a threat **at all**, given that Trump was still on stage, Crooks was still alive, and no one was on the roof to physically remove the weapon from Crooks (damaged weapon or not). The SWAT member also relayed that Crooks went down after the SWAT member's shot, popped up, and then was shot by USSS — so USSS may not have had a shot in that down window. All of this decision-making took place within about 4–10 seconds, and that is much more believable than the theory's timeline, which is that the USSS' thought process was 4–10 seconds of, "[Damn; our Manchurian Candidate failed, so now we have to take out the evidence.]" It's certainly *possible*, but it becomes improbable against the USSS' good-faith decision-making and the fact that USSS routinely and infamously goes through lie-detectors. Results could certainly be faked, but a general rule is that the more a theory has to expand into co-conspirators the less likely it becomes. Conspiracies of system are much more likely here (e.g., hiring incompetence through DEI). At any rate, the SWAT member's shot is shown here. You can see when he took his initial shot (partially obscured behind a metal beam), a pause (4–10 seconds), then him pumping his fist after the USSS takes the kill shot: [jeffostroff; August 18th, 2024] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3kAFu3sU6Q Channel "Gray Hughes" picked up the same story but several hours earlier: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2TOR17hXMZk They both point out that the ground officer's video (which shows the SWAT member) was actually off by about 12 seconds. This means that the SouthEast sniper team actually had 1:20 - 12s or about 1:08 of observing the AGR rooves before firing. Higgins' initial report also adds detail to the damage seen in the dead-Crooks image, which is that the final shot by USSS "entered somewhere around the left mouth area and exited the right ear area". So obaminated was also about correct in Thread 1 when he said, "I guess they shot him straight through the mouth?" ( http://utopiaforums.com/boardthread?id=politics&thread=93008&time=1720921877144 ). We can now say that the USSS shot is visible in the dead-Crooks picture. The entry wound may be the dark spot on Crooks' upper mouth-area on his left (i.e., facing down towards the roof), with the exit wound partially visible as torn flesh about an inch below his right ear (that pic still available here http://x.com/utism_/status/1812301133706076671 ). This likely would have ripped through his teeth and brain stem (and/or upper spinal cord), causing the tooth damage and blood patterns we see. Higgins also complains about how quickly the FBI released the scene: just 3 days after the shooting. The FBI also *already* released the body to the family for cremation — even before a final coroner's report has been released. This fits for more FBI incompetence and maliciously bad oversight. Higgins also dispels the "water tower" idiots a bit. One of the more obviously bad theories was that a second shooter was on top of the water tower. These people were obviously over-interpreting a shadow, and the angle from there would not have matched any other trajectories. But, Higgins further dunks on them by explaining that the water tower was fenced off, the ladder is 20 feet off the ground (has to be accessed by special crews), two police units were guarding the wooded area around it, and there is an additional ladder to the roof — all of this adding a lot of time to any second shooter's efforts. Higgins was one of the few anti-ESG people at the 2023 Hearings, so I do not think he's a full-blown Regime apparatchik, but he does "stand with Israel", which could indicate he's playing a role in an Israeli coverup. Overall, though, his work currently seems trustworthy. TLDR: Local police disabled Crooks. USSS took the kill shot. FBI is fumbling the crime scene. |
Cherub Cow
Member | Tue Aug 27 06:31:29 Not only did the FBI release Crooks' body to the family for cremation in about 3 days, but the coroner was not notified: "‘Do You Find It Odd…?’: Cory Mills Presses Witnesses On Puzzling Details Surrounding Trump Shooting" [Forbes Breaking News; August 26th, 2024] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JbibIbXWMvE Full hearing on C-Span: [August 26th, 2024] http://www.c-span.org/video/?537968-1/house-republicans-host-forum-trumps-attempted-assassination The FBI also released the Crooks residence as a scene within about 3 days. This is on top of other issues such as the FBI cleaning the crime scene after 3 days and the FBI maintaining its (usual) complete lack of transparency. At this point, it is very likely that they have Crooks' manifesto but are withholding it. It is only fortunate, then, that the Gab CEO released Crooks' on-platform identity and exposed that he was a leftist. The FBI would likely not have revealed that information, just as investigators attempted to hide that Audrey Hale, who murdered 6 Christians including 3 children in March 2023, was a trans-man on testosterone who specifically and intentionally targeted a school because it was a predominantly White Christian school. Hale's manifesto had to be released (in part) through police leaks to independent media. While I would have liked to think that the FBI wouldn't behave maliciously in such a high-profile case where the public has access to a great deal of information already (i.e., the obvious availability of information forcing them to at least admit to those known details), it seems that they take any opportunity to act in bad faith. There is pretty much nothing keeping them honesty. Director Wray basically said nothing at his appearance at a July 24th hearing — though he *did* try to float the lie that it may not have been a bullet that hit Trump (it was) — and there has not been any followup now a month later. The FBI's actions so far have been entirely consistent with them being a Bolshevik-owned organization. |
show deleted posts |
![]() |