Utopia Talk / Politics / The jewish Question (Thread #1 of 110)

Cherub Cow rank	Sun Mar 01 17:41:29 Previous thread: http://uto...hread=95502&time=1771693782147 Thus we established that the jew serves Memnoch the Devil ("Melmoth the Wanderer"; the Wandering jew) and is "Chosen" only by this Satan; no one is "Chosen" without Good Works, and the jew rejects all such Good Works, even believing that he is above menial tasks (see, for instance, the laziness of the jew on his "shabbas" and how historically he has insisted that non-jews work on their own sabbaths). It is the nature of the jew to destroy and enslave, and indeed all of the fruits of his behavior work towards these ends above all others. We will now turn our attention to the jew as the alien. This was covered thematically in the previous thread via stories of the jew as "alien" immigrant in, for instance, "Superman". We recall that the comic-book Superman was created in 1938 by the the jewish Joe Shuster and the jewish Jerry Siegel from a distortion of Nietzsche's work on the «Übermensch» (the "Over-Man"). The jewish version of the Superman (mashiach) is encapsulated in the jewish murderers and homo/pederasts Leopold and Loeb, who, believing themselves to be Nietzsche's Over-Man, killed a little White boy for sport in what they felt was the height of their nature. In the mind of the jew, it is thus Clark Kent himself who is Superman — a jewish reporter in charge of public perception — and the persona of "Superman" is how the deluded jew sees himself and publicizes himself to the public (i.e., Clark Kent is the reality of the jew and "Superman" is the jew's self-deception). We see this lived-out in the jew's real-life large-scale capture of media, with explicitly jewish papers such as the New York Times being merely the falsification of an "objective" standard which very transparently serves world jewry. We see this also in the jewish ADL, which was founded after a jewish murderer, Leo Frank, was correctly hanged until dead following his sick crime of raping, mutilating, and killing a little White girl for sport. And the fiction of Superman shows an interesting story as well: the jew as literal alien (within fiction). That is, we cannot forget that the jew in his story has used not just the metaphor of an immigrant but a fictional telling of an alien from another world ("Superman" being from Krypton). This is a recurring theme in stories which warn of the jew or which describe the jew via "Revelation of the Method". For instance, it might surprise people to know that these are all stories of the jew: • "The Day The Earth Stood Still" (1951 and 2008) • "The Puppet Masters" (1951) • "Invasion of the Body Snatchers" (1956 and 1978) • "The Thing" (1982) • "They Live" (1988) • "The Faculty" (1998) Thus we see a recurring theme in alien fictions which warn of world jewry: • infiltration • parasitism • virus logic • subversion of hosts • destruction and compromise of authority figures • capture of truth-making apparatuses (e.g., media, education, government) • uncanny replication or inhuman variants (e.g., the hybrid, the mind-controlled, the similar but 'not quite right') We can recall of "The Day The Earth Stood Still" (1951), for instance, that the story begins in an idyllic (at that time simply "normal") American town near/within D.C. The alien, Klaatu, after escaping into society, is able to wander into a boarding house where he is received as a normal White man. The character of Helen Benson is so trusting of well-to-do White men (as might be typical of relationships between White men and White women in a functioning and homogeneous society) that she very quickly entrusts her own son to be watched unattended by Klaatu for the afternoon. The dramatic irony here, of course, is that Helen sees a trustworthy White man, while the audience knows that this is an alien. The audience can sense the danger, but Helen, who lacks the perception to see this distinction (e.g., via the strange mannerisms of this outsider which are not quite right), trusts the alien. Of course, as the story progresses and she learns the truth, she finds that Klaatu is not only an alien but has already seized total control of society (this is via the metaphor of controlling all machines; this relates to the jew as the gremlin in the machine, which was explored later by Spielberg). We thus see multiple warnings here which include a new need in the West to be suspicious of these uncanny visitors (a loss of trust in society following WWII jewish immigration), a need to be vigilant about infiltration and ploys for control of society by these foreigners (e.g., taking care not to grant foreigners access to industry), and the precarious position of having to convince infiltrating foreigners to *not* destroy one's own society. Of this last point we see this position given even more drama in the updated version (2008). In the 1951 version, we see a particularly White American perspective at work, wherein world jewry is threatening the annihilation of the West and Westerners are forced to bargain for their own right to live following the full infiltration of the jew. In the 2008 version, however, much of White society has already been destroyed by the jew. Instead, a composite character for scientists (played by John Cleese) and the new Helen character all but plead to Klaatu to not destroy the world. Throughout the movie we see people of various ethnicities (e.g., Chinese, English, black) pleading with the jew not to destroy them. Even a jew (the jewish Jennifer Connelly) must plead with jewish power to not destroy these people, since her own son is part jew and part black. We thus see the monstrosity of the jew as alien, who is willing to destroy even his own people to expand some idea of jewish power, and we see that even those who accept multiculturalism are still to be destroyed by the jew (we can refer even this to jews arranging the Rwandan genocide so that blacks with White features would be annihilated). This theme of even other jews being expendable is further reflected in jewish works such as "Wag the Dog" (1997), where the works of a jewish producer in propagandizing the West are celebrated, but where one jew oversteps the plans of world jewry, he is eliminated. This is, of course, a reference to jews killing the jewish Stanley Kubrick (died March 1999) after Kubrick revealed the sexual blackmail and ritualistic murder schemes of Baal-worshiping jews in his movie "Eyes Wide Shut" (July 1999); Kubrick refused to censor his movie before release and gave-up too much of the game, and this was, of course, decades before the jewish Epstein scheme was revealed to the public. We see similar themes in the main storyline of the X-Files TV show and movies. The central story of the X-Files, as most readily revealed in the 1998 movie, is that civilization has been infiltrated by "aliens" who intend to colonize the world. Most of the "Men in Black" who work behind the scenes throughout the X-Files story are Western oligarchs who have been bargaining with these "aliens" since WWII ("The Syndicate"). In the movie, the Western oligarch played by John Neville even gives to Mulder the explicit motive of these "aliens": these "aliens" seek to create a "slave race" (his actual words) out of humanity, which will serve a new "alien" ruling authority. This is, of course, the jew's own prophecy of global domination, and "The Syndicate" is, of course, a cabal of treasonous oligarchs who are staying rich while their own people are annihilated. In Season 10 of the X-Files, which aired in 2016, the show-runners clearly even got further confirmation of their ideas of this "alien" scheme with regards to viral weaponry. They wrapped this story only a year or two before COVID-19 (season 11 wrapped in 2018): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CkmRyIz87ew In one line describing the main plot, they explain that a viral weapon will be developed to kill or enslave everyone but "the chosen" — these "chosen" being elites who will "cull, kill, and subjugate". Who could that be? Who calls themselves "chosen"? We can, of course, relate this to COVID-19's targeting pathway. COVID-19 selects highly for the ACE2 receptors of White Westerners, and has the lowest selection affinity to the ACE2 receptors of jews, particularly Ashkenazi jews ( https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7439997/ ). And, of course, this is before we even look at the utility of jewish-produced "vaccines", such as that of Pfizer's jewish CEO Albert Bourla. One of the hilarious (in a dark way) outcomes of conformism experiments conducted as a matter of "public health" by jewish oligarchs was that people would willingly get "vaccines" and "boosters", and in peak irony would face immense issues with their immune systems after these injections. It is almost a cliché that some boomer will tell you that they got a booster and then got COVID shortly afterwards, and rather than putting these details together (i.e., realizing that the booster caused the illness), they will tell themselves lies like that, "[It would have been worse if I hadn't just gotten that booster!]" So, effectively we have a propagandized public that is willingly making itself sick to please jewish agitprop. Current estimates are that about 70% of the American public is "fully vaccinated" and about 81% got at least one shot. Just imagine jews knowing that they can kill that percentage of the population. By some theories, these shots were pre-coding templates which can activate further weapons. So, for instance, a second weapon could be designed which targets people who carry the "vaccine", and those who bonded the most with the "vaccine" would become the sickest (e.g., White Westerners). This theme of the jew as alien continues today. The jewish Steven Spielberg is releasing "Disclosure Day" in June 2026, and this is transparently the story of the jew revealing his power to the world. Disclosure Day trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DLv9WFOe6GU We have referred this trope of the jew revealing himself to the world in previous stories of the vampire. Stories of the vampire are largely about the jew, and thus in these stories we see a familiar trope: the vampire is a disgusting creature (and, of course, a plague carrier, which aligns with the X-Files and historical cases of jews using viral weapons) which cannot see its own reflection. Like Clark Kent, he enthralls the public with agitprop which tells of his power and right to rule (a lie of the jew as "Superman"), but when the vampire is at last revealed by the "light" (i.e., the public's full awareness), he is destroyed. The jew, as vampire, thus imagines himself to be the rightful master of the world, but he can only maintain this self-perception so long as he stays in the shadows and avoids looking at himself as he actually is (i.e., the jew avoids his reflection and avoids the scrutiny of the broader public). In some tellings, this "light" is the Son of God, thus "sun" is combined with "son", and this pairs also with Christianity's defense against the jew. The vampire, as jew, is anti-Christ, and thus he turns away from all Christian signs (e.g., the Cross, the Church). The idea in these variations of the vampire story is that the "light" is both the sunlight which shows the horrible figure of the jew as well as the public's ability to carry the light of the Son of God, which, if properly held, will allow them to hold the morality necessary to send the jew back to his home in hell with his god, Memnoch the Devil. Since Christianity is often subverted by the jew (see, for instance, "dispensationalism" and the delusions of modern Christian Zionists), these vampire stories often warn of vulnerabilities within Christianity which might allow the jew entry (e.g., the cardinal sin of the vampire story is inviting the vampire into one's home in the first place). Some claim that Christianity itself *is* the jewish subversion, but this is an error that Nietzsche explores (this Nietzsche work will likely be examined in this thread). The jew is, after all, anti-Christ. I should also remind that it is not that any system is fully immune to subversion and thus we must blame a system itself for being subverted. You could literally build a society that has a sacred law that no jew ever be admitted, and after a few generations that law might well be subverted. In fact, jews were for this reason not allowed mass-immigration into these United States until the 1880s, which, as was elucidated in the previous thread, explains why Bram Stoker wrote Dracula in the 1890s. One example is the movie "Daybreakers" (2009), where the vampire pathogen can be destroyed by controlled light exposure and "save" the vampire, which is a metaphor for jews sincerely converting to Christianity. Naturally, that movie was not written or directed by jews but rather German-ancestry Australians. We should separately note that Martin Luther was largely correct about such attempts to convert jews to Christianity, which is to say that it is incredibly rare that this ever happens sincerely, and where conversion happens it is typically only done for subversion and securing of jewish breeding schemes (hence the "Dune" metaphor of the jewish Bene Gesserit). But, the world of "Daybreakers" at least shows that the ultimate outcome of jewish mastery of the world is vampires eating vampires until everyone has rotted into desperate parasites with no remaining hosts. So, within that context, the writers could be saying that jews would only convert to Christianity once they are brought to the natural conclusion of their own natures, which is, of course, self-annihilation. Of this note, we would refer to the Great and Glorious Titus Caesar Vespasianus, who did not defeat the jews so much as allow them to see their own destiny. This is also the story of the jew as the "wandering jew" (hence the jew's god is Memnoch the Devil or Melmoth the wanderer). The jew who remains anti-Christ (as the jew doomed to walk the earth for taunting Christ) is doomed to forever plague the dark corners of civilizations, denied entry or entering only through sick subversions (e.g., prostitution, usury, blackmail schemes in whore houses). The idea behind the jew as wanderer is that he must build his own society through his own good works and shed his disgusting natures. In the Melmoth story, this occurs through the jew attempting to subvert his way into society but being found out and scorned by faithful Christians. An idea within Melmoth's death in this 1820 tale is that the Devil has died in the jew and given way to living through Christ. Of course, again, as Martin Luther warned, we have never seen this take place in a jewish society. This is a door that Christians leave open for the jew at their own peril, which goes back to never inviting jews in in the first place; if they can fix their natures, they can do it on their own and away from all societies. Regarding "Disclosure Day", we can see why jews such as Spielberg are testing the waters by revealing "aliens" (jews and jewish power) to the world. The pride involved in the vampire story is that the vampire accumulates more and more power until he believes that his power can overcome people's shock at his sick nature. Hence stories such as Dracula proceed as the vampire gains more and more power and more and more footholds in the target society. In the case of "Disclosure Day", these "aliens" have infiltrated all societies globally. So, with their total power consolidated across all nations, jews in this story believe that they can reveal themselves to the world as its rightful master-enslavers. We can speculate how this will go, even with just the trailer so far. • Spielberg's 1977 "Close Encounters of the Third Kind", for instance, has already shown what the jewish Spielberg believes could take place with such a reveal of jewish power. The absurdly long and weird light and music show is, of course, a representation of jewish cinema. Thus, Spielberg figures that a perk of jews showing that they are in power is that audiences will delight at what jews can show them. Spielberg has also released works which warns jews about poor paths that they might take, such as • showing in "Munich" (2005) that jewish terrorism harmed not just these United States on 9/11 but has also resulted in a loss of jewish security in the diaspora (e.g., the surviving jewish terrorist fears for his life and is permanently paranoid and violently destructive of even his new friendly hosts). • In "Minority Report" (2002), Spielberg warned of what jewish pre-crime could do to society, basically warning of the issue of jewish anarcho-tyranny, where low-impulse-control criminals (classes "protected" by the jew) would be the only ones allowed to commit crimes while law-abiding citizens would be terrorized by these same jewish "protected" classes because they, being able to think ahead, would not commit crimes. • "Saving Private Ryan" (1998) even attempts to convince jews that they should be thankful that many Americans died to liberate and save them, which is a counter to the primary jewish narrative that basically posits that "no one" came to help the jews and that they saved themselves. Netanyahu himself continues to float this latter narrative (e.g., 2024: "Eighty years ago, during the Holocaust, the Jewish people were completely defenseless against those who wanted to destroy them. No nation offered assistance at that time" https://ww...-again-is-now/865645961989047/ ). In opposition, however, we should note that Spielberg also made Indiana Jones, which is a story of jews using Western power to reclaim "their" artifacts. The 2008 movie "Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull" was awful, of course, but what did Spielberg *say*? Regarding aliens, the claim he made is that all magic artifacts in the world (e.g., the Holy Grail, the Ark) were imbued with power by "aliens". Of course, we know that aliens are jews now, do we not? So while some complained that this plot point meant that Spielberg was undoing his previous films, in the truth of the "alien"-as-jew metaphor, Spielberg was saying that jews gave all powers to the world. So, in this narrative, it was jews who put power into the Ark of the Covenant and jews who gave the Holy Grail its power. In effect, he is doing as many jews have done, which is to claim that they invented everything everywhere, and especially that they invented Western religion. This is false, of course, but jews are vampires so they believe in their own prideful lies and cannot see their reflections. We should note further of "Ready Player One" (2018) that Spielberg is already on board with a jewish globalism. The premise of the story is that the world has been completely destroyed and made into Brazilian favelas (even in the West), but rather than people disconnecting from the shared delusion which has resulting in the decay of the real world, Spielberg's "benevolent" ending is that jews can celebrate the shabbas, since the delusion is only shut down one day a week. So, yes, all of society remains in ruin, but one day a week you can observe jewish ritual. We can see that pride at work. So these are the expectations we can have for "Disclosure Day". Like "Crystal Skull", X-Files, The Thing, and so many other "alien" fictions, we will likely face a narrative that "aliens" (jews) have been here since the beginning, and in Spielberg's version these jews likely will get away with exposing their power to the world because they'll be able to take credit for all of the "gifts" that they've given to the world — you know, like pornography, usury, exploitation, sexual blackmail, immoralism, enslavement. Oh no! Certainly *those* gifts will be omitted! But this technique of using "aliens" to reveal jewish power is an old one, and we should end by noting that this serves the jewish use of "Revelation of the Method", which in short goes that public opinion can be shaped or monitored by using these thinly veiled stories. So, if this is not Spielberg outright saying that jews are close to announcing that they are in control of the entire world (which is already happening but not to the broader public), then it is him checking-in with audiences on behalf of world jewry to ask, "[Theoretically... if 'aliens' were in control of the world... would you be okay with it?]" This is related to a thought exercise I put in Movie Talk years ago regarding the Star Trek TNG episode "The Nth Degree" (S04E19). The episode follows Lieutenant Barclay, who has been accelerated into extreme intelligence by some alien force. He uses this intelligence to take command of the Enterprise. But, the episode ends when the Enterprise has been successfully piloted by the hijacked Barclay into visiting a curious wizard-like alien who embodies all of the values of the explorer-minded Enterprise crew, who are delighted with the encounter despite all of the preceding drama. So, the thought exercise is this: was it okay for Barclay to hijack the Enterprise? Were the crew wrong to oppose Barclay, given that they got what they wanted? I forget who, but someone got very pissed off in that thread since they missed the point of the thought exercise. The answer is that of *course* the crew was right to oppose the hijacking of the ship. This is because of *control* and *choice* as self-determination. We cannot pre-figure that the destination is benevolent when the design is hidden or obscured (as indeed Barclay gave little indication that he was bringing the crew somewhere good). When we allow a pilot to bring us to another destination, we surrender control, but the choice of destination is maintained. When we surrender choice to someone whom we trust and whose values are similarly benevolent, we maintain control despite their own choices. But these variables are not met with the jew. As warned about in the X-Files, Melmoth, Dracula, and by centuries of tales of the jew, they hold the morality of Satan, and thus giving them control and choice which overrules our own lives will only result in the obliteration of free, noble, and wise peoples of the world.
Cherub Cow rank	Sun Mar 01 17:45:19 Oops, this is thread #2 of 110. .. Next topics: "STEPHEN BLOOM (Interview #16) His investigation into the Chabad Lubavitcher group in Postville, Iowa" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UAAYM4cm3EI "I Exposed New Jersey's Jewish Invasion..." [Tyler Oliveira; February 23rd, 2026] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cubO0lhOMcs
Cherub Cow rank	Sat Mar 07 20:44:24 Trump: "The strongest lobby in Washington was the jewish lobby ... the most powerful lobby" [March 6th, 2026] http://x.com/BackupJeffx/status/2030034628078125352 Mind you, Trump is not speaking in a true past-tense; he is speaking rhetorically to show that the jewish lobby *was* **and** *is* the "strongest" and "most powerful lobby", and that its only shortcoming is that particular Islamic politicians are speaking out against that power (e.g., Omar, Tlaib). Trump even references Australia with regards to their recent shooting, with the hint being that Australia responded to that shooting in this way: [Premier of Queensland, David Crisafulli]: "We've just passed the strongest antisemitism laws in the country." [March 5th, 2026] http://x.com/DavidCrisafulli/status/2029455764197372415 And jews in these United States mean to respond similarly. For years these foreigners (jews) have talked about passing the IHRA definition of "antisemitism" as illegal "hate speech", and this has accelerated recently: "Zionist lawfare activist Kenneth L. Marcus of the Louis D. Brandeis Center says explicitly at a congressional briefing that he's working for the IHRA definition of "anti-Semitism" to become "the law of the land" in the United States of America." [March 5th, 2026] https://x.com/infolibnews/status/2029799391465292109 (People should note that the IHRA definition of "antisemitism" is so ridiculously broad that it basically applies to any criticism of jews or Israel at all.) This is, of course, a malicious and evil bypass of the sacred First Amendment. "Hate speech" is a jewish fiction designed to produce a slave revolt in morality by protecting resentful and slavish destroyers at the expense of the sovereign. This is most transparent in the fact that subversives (jews) — being estimated at just 2.4% of the population of these United States — insist on having their own special laws which overrule the laws of the White Westerners whose nation it is. (Imagine being a foreign element of just 2.4% of a population but demanding that your host not criticize your disproportionate power.) And, of course, this kind of malicious and evil bypass is sold with very flimsy rhetorical tricks which all amount to special pleading. It is the same tired tropes, such as that any criticism could only ever possibly result in the Holobunga (which is historically false given the many other ways that nations have handled jewish subversion) or that "hate" of jews is "unique" and needs that protection (special pleading). Many on the Right heard these same retarded arguments from the LGBTQ2S+NAMBLA BLM/Antifa leftists after the 2016 meltdowns since those subverted leftists were using jewish slave morality to advance their positions, but we can of course notice that Christian Zionists (kikeslaves) will accept this transparent special-pleading when it is used for jews. That is, Christian Zionists can see the absurdity when it's used by subverted leftists, but they are suddenly blind to the absurdity when it applies to jews. This special pleading is how slave revolts in morality offboard power to their "special elect". The vicious spiral of the slave revolt in morality inverts power such that the most dysgenic, resentful, and destructive of the slavish and impotent in society are elevated. When *un*checked, this would mean that we'd end up being ruled by a trans Bengali Sarah Biffen / Helen Keller combo. But a "special elect" controls this outcome: people taking part in that slave revolt in morality ("woke") grant that special power to the most "historically oppressed" group. And who has the "best" story of "oppression" in history? jews, of course. The entire false narrative of a slave revolt in morality is thus designed and unleashed by jews and on behalf of jews, since they are its ultimate inheritors. Thus, Christian Zionists fully support "woke" *if* it makes jews the enslavers of the world. Christian Zionists *only* oppose "woke" if it gives power to non-jew leftists. This is because Christian Zionists are themselves leftists who are leaning on jews as their "rightful" enslavers. They themselves have been subverted by this 2.4% bloc of foreign agitators.
Asgard rank	Sun Mar 08 17:30:00 Jews live rent free in your mind But as any good Jews would say- it’s pay day, now gimme the money
williamthebastard rank	Sun Mar 08 17:56:12 Makes no sense. Someone who lets a living space doesnt pay the people living there.
Asgard rank	Sun Mar 08 18:57:45 I don’t know Jews are supposed to br the landlords and bad ones too no? Just trying to fit the narrative
Cherub Cow rank	Mon Mar 09 00:45:45 [Assfag]: "Jews live rent free in your mind" That is another good example of a low-IQ jewish cliché that we should now examine, thank you. We see many such slavish lies and distortions from the jew. I listed this formula with regards to sociopathic abuser-jews in the previous thread (comment "Sun Feb 01 02:42:56"; also http://x.com/CherubCow/status/1777986978870366293 ). We can develop this by saying that the jew is afflicted with many genetic maladies which inform his disturbed psychology. For instance, the jew is often afflicted with narcissistic delusions, autistic dysfunction, sociopathy, negligent disregard, degenerate perversions, and sadomasochistic megalomania. The jew Freud, for instance, with his "Oedipus Complex", was describing the particularly *jewish* nature of having improper feelings for the mother and murderous desires for the father (this jewish nature connects with the jewish god Memnoch the Devil and its Devouring Mother aspect). Under this framework of jewish psychology, we could understand how disturbed and disfigured individuals would demand a society which is not allowed to criticize ghouls and goblins, hence, censorship is a jewish imperative; they would love to stop you from talking about those who would ruin you. Thus, Assfag's slavish distortions are part of the subversive jewish trope of, "[Why are you so obsessed with the elephant in the room who's destroying the room?]" The irony of this elephant statement should speak for itself, but to provide clarity for the dense: obviously we should speak of the idiosyncratic, the monstrous, the vexatious, and the damning. If a thousand gulls chip away at our flesh, do we pretend that there is no blood lost because each gull only filled its stomach with a mere mouthful? The jew will leverage the wealth of the West, placing billions of dollars of military equipment and the very lives of our beloved peoples against the jew's own enemies in Iran, Syria, Lebanon, etc., then cynically say of detractors, "[Why do you care so much about what happens to the wealth of your nations? Why do you care so much about your prosperity and posterity? Why do you not simply and passively accept your enslavement to our twisted ends?]" Shakespeare spoke of these pilpul clichés in his work on the jewish Question titled "The Merchant of Venice" (1598). This was covered from another angle in the previous thread (comment "Mon Feb 09 14:16:17"), and since this particular work on the jewish Question has now seen utility twice, we will have to examine the work in full in another comment. For now in this comment, we will focus on a particular detail of the play. We see in this Shakespearean work that the jew is again attempting to be a master-enslaver who provokes slave revolts in morality, and narrowing on a particular aspect of this, Shakespeare's jew, Shylock, asks for impossible deals since the nature of the jew is sick and twisted — a nature which cannot comprehend the parable of the Goose and the Golden Egg. Thus we have the *popular* (not original) origin of the phrase, "a pound of flesh", which is mentioned several times in the play but first and most notably here: Shylock: O father Abram, what these Christians are, Whose own hard dealings teaches them suspect The thoughts of others. Pray you, tell me this, If he should break his day, what should I gain By the exaction of the forfeiture? A pound of man’s flesh, taken from a man, Is not so estimable, profitable neither, As flesh of muttons, beefs, or goats. I say, To buy his favour, I extend this friendship. If he will take it, so. If not, adieu, And for my love I pray you wrong me not. There is a great deal of the jew's nature in this one simple selection. • false victimhood • falsely stated "good" deal; scammer/haggling behavior • false minimization; making the large small and the small large • mocking use of asymmetry; rejection of symmetry • Christians as animals/cattle We might note the common trope of jews thinking of Christians as less even than cattle (something which persists in the jew today; this has not changed). But above all we should notice the twisted and cynical *tone* of the jew. This is a tone of mockery, trickery, and double-dealing. This is the tone of the vindictive and malicious Devouring Mother (an aspect of the jew's god, Memnoch the Devil) who would taunt a man with critiques of the masculinity which she does not possess. Or, as like the nature of the gulls above, the jew mocks those who are affected by his taking of a "pound of flesh". Thus notice how Shylock simultaneously insists (deceptively) that he's taking very little: • "not so estimable"! (such an unnoticeable amount!) • "profitable neither"! (such a small benefit to Shylock himself — or so he says with his sick tone!) ..while *also* (in reality) his "deal" is one where he is taking flesh off the bone of his debtor, killing the debtor. Of this "flesh" (as metaphor) we should note the meaning of wealth in *functional* nations (cf. nations subverted by the jew where wealth is devalued by inflation and central banking), since it is this wealth that the jew (here: Shylock) exploits. In functional societies, money is a sacred store of the Good Works we have performed, with those Good Works being the very expenditure of our *lives*. Hence, any debt is upon our very lives. Thus, while the jew so often claims that he is merely collecting debts, Shakespeare is pointing out that the jew is collecting the very flesh of those he exploits, precipitating their deaths. It is in Shakespeare's rhetorical device here that we thus see that the jew uses a practiced lie when he pretends that his exploitations are not even worth notice, while truly the jew's natures are murderous and destructive. Thus when the jew says that he lives "rent free", he is mocking your very notice of his wickedness and his disgusting malevolence. Even were you the strongest god to ever cast lightning from the heavens, the jew would mock you for righteously smiting someone like him — a mere parasite has been scorched by a god, he would say! Thus we must learn that the jew's deceptions are distractions independent of the justice granted to the jew by his very nature, as likewise the Great and Glorious Titus Caesar Vespasianus merely granted the jews their nature, as they are a people not meant for a second temple much less a third. We see also in this selection *how* the jew so flippantly steals while mocking those who suspect his nature. In the very conduct of his deception he pretends that he should not even be suspected of the deception! ("Teaches them suspect / the thoughts of others.") And he codes this (rightful!) suspicion as the conduct of Christians not being proper Christians! ("[A proper Christian would not suspect Satan of being evil, since suspicion is sin!]") I spoke of this in the previous thread as the jew's exploitation of Western universalism and conscientiousness (e.g., comment "Mon Feb 09 14:16:17"). The jew knows that he is devious and double-dealing, but he knows that through deception he can have his betters hold themselves to a morality that he himself intends never to possess, he being anti-Christ. Thus he begs Christians to be Christ-like as his sinister ploy, when he has not even a "pound" of himself that would follow Christ, and, in fact, as previously noted, the jew believes that Christ is boiling in excrement and semen in hell for the "crime" of opposing the jew. { We should note aside here that this deceptive double-dealing is why the jew was so often made to wear signs that he is a jew. Those who have been brainwashed by the jew's agitprop will immediately think of WWII badges and the guilt-by-association label of "nazis", but this narrative is again the jew's destruction of all history under Orwell's "1984" warning of the jew's nature. In reality, we see even in early England (very soon after William the Conqueror; already by the 1100s) that the jew was made to wear the "jewish cap" ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_hat ). This was not merely the yarmulke that jews often voluntarily wear today but was a very pronounced hat which allowed Christians to know that they were dealing with demons from hell who, as Satan's spawn, will quote the Bible to them with a twisted tongue but never enter a Church without bursting into flames. } And *why* does Shylock the jew behave with such deception against Christians? Some claim that Shylock is one of Shakespeare's villains that has no motivation, which would put Shylock in the company of Iago and Aaron the Moor. But Shylock, Iago, and Aaron *all* are motivated by their very *natures*. In some scenes Shylock will obfuscate this nature, but the answer is given in his very obfuscation: Shylock: You’ll ask me why I rather choose to have A weight of carrion flesh than to receive Three thousand ducats. I’ll not answer that, But say it is my humour. Is it answer’d? What if my house be troubled with a rat, And I be pleas’d to give ten thousand ducats To have it ban’d? What, are you answer’d yet? Shylock goes on here to compare his "humour" to signs of his nature. His talk here is of what payment is *worth* to certain people, where some will pay heavy prices (in coin), but *he* wants to be paid in Christian flesh, which is in accordance with his nature (i.e., what one values is in accordance with one's nature). So we see that the "why" is from nature, and the nature of the jew is that of a resentful parasite. The jew hates and loves Christians, since he lives by the blood and Good Works of the Christian but simultaneously resents them for being his betters. A parasite can never exceed its host, but the jew, being a conscious parasite filled with delusions of being "chosen", fancies that he can extract flesh endlessly, even from a rotting corpse. The more savvy among these parasites figure that they could breed a race of slaves whose flesh could be endlessly extracted without the burden of consciousness, which would indeed place humanity beneath animals. But as in the story of the vampire, which, as previously covered, is a metaphor for the jew, this scheme constantly backfires for the jew. Each time the jew places plague, famine, debt, and enslavement ahead of himself in the scorching of earth for his arrival, he finds in the eyes of his hosts that life itself is his antithesis and its instinct cannot be bred away in ten thousand generations. Flees cannot out-breed the skin of the dying ram. Bassanio does not understand this fact of jewish nature, but Portia learns this by the end of the play. Naturally, she does this via a theme common also in fictions of the vampire: she shows the jew his reflection, which brings him terror. In Shakespeare, this "mirror" is accomplished by terrifying the jew with the prospect of him suffering the debt that he wishes to inflict upon others. Thus, Shylock must *himself* give a pound of flesh, and in mockery of the jew Shylock's deception that a pound of flesh from a Christian is a trifle ("not so estimable"), Portia insists that Shylock do this without bleeding, lest he be put to death and all of his wealth confiscated (arguably, the latter is even more important to the jew than the former, especially when we note stories of jews on their death beds talking about money they made — and where we understand that this money is symbolic of Christians that the jew has killed, the message becomes even more clear). This impossible task is a means for Portia to communicate to the jew what he was actually asking of Christians (beyond his deceptions and double-dealing) and admit to it by rejecting the cost upon himself, which, in symmetry, means that he must stop exacting the cost upon Christians. We can see this pact in the closing of the play as a *condition* that Christian society must exact upon the jew: the jew *cannot* be given unconditional reign in a Christian society, because this will result in the killing of Christians. Thus, a *condition* must be that if a jew commits usury against Christians, then that jew must suffer the fate of those he indebted. This is one means for how universalism and conscientiousness is restored to a society that keeps jews among it (to say nothing of those who successfully remove the jew). { Aside, we should note that this is the same metaphor sampled for the movie "Se7en" (1995). The jewish character "Eli Gould" is referred to as the "blood-sucking lawyer". The "John Doe" character combines Shakespeare with Dante's Inferno for Gould's sin; Gould's punishment for the sin of "Greed" is that he must remove a pound of his own flesh and place it on a scale — if he does not, he will be put to death. This was to "turn ... sin against the sinner" as in the symmetry of Dante's punishments. Gould bleeds to death on his hollow books of subverted and manipulated laws that he thought would protect him from divine judgment. } And what, then, is the symmetry for jewish malevolence? The jew uses "special pleading" to reject symmetry, and nowhere is this more accepted than among Christian Zionists. But these Christian Zionists are themselves spiritually jewish and lack the blood to move the wheels of history, so their silence or sometimes pathetic whimpering will be irrelevant as the clock ticks away the boomers. Their obstinacy at learning that dispensationalism is a scam will cost them in equal measure with how long they avoid the truth of that jewish deception; their punishment grows with each day that they continue to accept the lie of dispensationalism despite the warnings of its heresy. In the case of Germany, we can refer to the sign upon Auschwitz for an example of an attempt at symmetry: «Arbeit macht fre» ("Work will set you free.") As the meme goes, "Ay Tony, what if they just didn't like working?" That is, if parasites are so thoroughly used to extracting labor from Christians, and no Christians are present to work for jews (as in the camps), then would not jews suffer *only* from their *own* natures? This is, again, not a "nazi" position. I already referenced Titus to show that this precedes the "nazis" by millennia. The "punishment" so often placed upon the jew is to live with his own nature. This means letting the vampire eat only other vampires (the metaphor of the movie "Daybreakers" (2009), covered above). In practical language, this reiterates points already made here: • jews should not be allowed to draw welfare from the general fund; they should only be allowed to draw welfare from other jews • jews should not be allowed to work in any form of wealth extraction or propaganda (i.e., denied access to banking/finance, law, politics, entertainment/media, and the vote) • jewish wars should only be funded by jewish labors (e.g., the Iran war should come only from jewish wealth and that wealth should not be extracted from the general fund) I once simplified this even further by saying that war-funding for Israel should only be an opt-in line item on taxes, and I received some shocked rejection from a Christian Zionist. "[My word! We couldn't possibly fund wars without the general fund!]" And in that shock is an admission of jewish nature and what becomes of it when given its due symmetry. We all know the future of a parasite that has no host.
Asgard rank	Mon Mar 09 00:56:08 Not gonna read that My nose has an itch Must be because it’s a big jew nose Lots of nosrtile
Cherub Cow rank	Mon Mar 09 02:20:05 [Assfag]: "Not gonna read that" Thus we further verify that the jewish claim of a high verbal IQ is a fiction meant only to obfuscate his shameless nepotism. The jew is largely illiterate, and we see parallels to the many leftists who are similarly illiterate (e.g., the many leftists of UP who live by the refrain of saying that they will never read). That is, leftists are effectively illiterate, jews are largely leftists, and thus jews are illiterate. Even in his torah studies the jew is fueled by autistic rocking and Ritalin. As the jew ages, he replaces this brief period of mental exercise with a reflexive tendency to simply undermine any word or meaning via his "pilpul", which we have seen in recent decades referred to as "postmodernism", particularly the practice of undermining foundations and unities. This jewish practice requires very little brain power, since the formula of acid dissolving reason avoids the concrete in favor of the fears of the 12-year-old who is forever scarred by having to read the torah in front of his grand parents. Many of the most slavish of the jews (the left-wing atheist jews) shit themselves in their sleep over these memories of having to stand in the real world in the company of silent jews whose neurotic faces and judgments haunt them into further self-hatred. (Imagine being a dysgenic freak intimidated by older dysgenic freaks, but living in a society of White Westerners who are afflicted by no such maladies — this is the terror of the jew, whose life forms upon the perpetual fears of his impotent ancestors, like those who were slaughtered at Masada by Roman swords but in their pathetic fictions decided instead to lie and say that there was a mass suicide.) The jew often lacks even the courage for suicide, and he knows the truth of this and of what happened at Masada when he remembers that he was too afraid even to look up from the bimah. In the Tyler Oliveira video above we can see the natural habitat of this dysgenic caste of parasite, which is largely under the belief that the world should be constructed in a way which best allows parasites to thrive. Thus "our democracy" is the natural jewish state, since if ten thousand parasites can vote to overrule the single vote of a strong host, then "democracy" has won. We even see the jew exemplify the sociopathic abuser's logic in this "democracy", saying that his absolute lack of virtues are irrelevant since he won at "democracy". This is why the jew fears Kings, and his own mashiach betrays the jew in their own fictions and the fictions of all who see clearly the jewish destiny: a dried leaf disintegrating in a cold and dry winter, disintegration, nothingness without end.
Asgard rank	Mon Mar 09 10:22:34 It’s called prioritization Your drivel is low priority
williamthebastard rank	Mon Mar 09 11:27:42 Not even on the list. The only time I might consider reading her pedophile death cult illness is if I was locked up in solitary for a year and only had that and a C. Manson rant to take my mind off things, and Id already read Manson 500 times
Cherub Cow rank	Mon Mar 09 12:31:08 [williamthecoward]: "The only time I might consider reading" This lie of yours might be convincing if you had demonstrated the ability to read anything ever. Every time you get butthurt about me calling out your clear illiteracy, you transparently create a thread that is supposed to prove otherwise, and in that thread you only *further* prove how completely illiterate you are with your terrible grammar, typos, poor comprehension, and a catalogue of other errors. On one occasion, you even tried to appear to have a grasp on science by talking about your translation of medical pamphlets, and in the process you posted dozens of errors that you did not even realize that you had made, such as not realizing how important capitalization is in IUPAC and SI standards and not knowing the importance of units at all ( http://uto...hread=94710&time=1751917388526 ). So you were trying to appear so much more intelligent than the program you were using, but you were admitting that you do indeed use A.I. to do your "work" just as we had suspected (lol) and you were admitting that you didn't understand that the program was assuming that you had used the *correct* symbols when you had fed it *incorrect* prompts! And this was supposed to be your demo of how good you are at your low-salary job! (rofl!) :D On a more recent occasion, you attempted to make a thread on literacy which was supposed to prove that you are *not* illiterate, but even your own attempt at producing evidence was systematically flawed ( http://uto...hread=95716&time=1772672373993 )! Your best steel-man argument was that there might be people in your nation who are literate so by osmosis you perhaps possess their virtues — but in fact you are a schoolboy hiding behind a teacher's skirt at recess; you do not possess those virtues since you can never demonstrate them even in your own concerted and intentional defense! :D So it is as I have long said: the slave/death cult of the subverted left is one of willful ignorance and its subsequent self-censorship. They are ultimately conformists, and they conform to the will of their enslavers. Their enslavers do not want them to know certain information, and so when they encounter that information, they intuit the will of their enslavers and recognize the information as taboo. They then form standard justifications for why they are selectively avoidant, such as pathetic thought-terminating clichés (e.g., "fascist", "nazi") or saying that they are above the very act of reading, which is a hilarious practice of Orwellian doublethink ("[I never read anything taboo, but I definitely *could* one day, but also I never will. I could improve, but I shouldn't and won't]"). The slave/death cult of leftists/conformists refers always to the mob as its proof of itself. It relies on falsified credentials, the lies of "experts" who can never prove themselves outside of those credentials, "popular" will among the slave masses, deferral to the processes of a mass of faceless bureaucrats, and popular conformism as measured in slavish echo chambers. In Faustian irrelevance they claim that there is a god inside of themselves that is waiting to be born, but their conformism suffocates that god daily, ensuring that no gift of creation which they ever once possessed could ever be born. They wake daily and immediately try to replace the desperate pleas of their own consciousness to *live*.. with whatever is being mandated for the conformists on that day. We see the absolute proof of this in williamthecoward. He has remained perpetually in the opening of the "Red Badge of Courage", hiding in the chaos of the mob and fearing that he might be pushed to the front. His entire narrative is an empty falsification of an experience that he cannot comprehend much less mimic correctly. For years he has hidden behind his willful ignorance and used the left's slavish substitute for power: thought-terminating clichés, calls for censorship, and demented and perverted fan fiction about the sexual mutilation of corpses, which is indeed the will of the enslavers that he dutifully obeys. It was, after all, the jewish Bolsheviks who celebrated "our democracy" at work when the czar family was killed, disfigured and mutilated with rifle butts and acid, sexually violated after death, and discarded in a mine shaft. That sort of description pleases the inverted morality of the slavish williamthecoward. Cowards and subverted leftists crave the mutilation of corpses as a revenge against the sexual access that their own invitation of a sickly morality denied them, whereas we of the Noble West would have them learn a conscience as soon as possible so that their own memories of betraying their ancestors can at least one day in the future become fewer than those of having decided to live a better life.
Asgard rank	Mon Mar 09 13:00:56 ChatGPT, stop writing.
williamthebastard rank	Mon Mar 09 13:18:18 ChatGPT isnt allowed to write psychotic nazi rants like that. She literally sits writing tens of thousands of words of pyschotic nervous breakdown and posts all over the net instead of looking for a job. Its fun to copy and paste a couple of her expressions of mental illness into ChatGPT and ask it to analyze it, but dont post the analysis here, because Kargen in his lust for defending psychotic nazism deletes them.
williamthebastard rank	Mon Mar 09 13:23:43 Lets see if he still does. Its fun that just one single post is analyzed as long and verbose, boy, it would crash if one posted the entire thread. ChatGPT analysis of first post in this thread: "The text you shared is a long, verbose, and highly toxic piece of writing that promotes classic antisemitic conspiracy theories. Here’s a careful analysis of its content, structure, and methods: (Long list) Overall Impression The text is a classic example of modern antisemitic conspiracy theory. It combines historical distortion, fearmongering, pseudo-intellectualism, and pop culture allegory to construct a narrative of Jewish world domination. False causation: Links unrelated events to Jews to suggest coordinated malicious intent. Its rhetorical aim is to scare and morally delegitimize Jews while presenting the author’s worldview as rational and morally superior. It lacks credible evidence, relies on cherry-picked examples, and is steeped in hyperbole and fabricated connections. It is designed to instill fear, mistrust, and moral panic This document is not just offensive; it is dangerous propaganda. Its use of movies, literature, and historical events to justify antisemitism is a method often seen in extremist circles to recruit or reinforce beliefs."
Cherub Cow rank	Mon Mar 09 14:23:31 [Assfag]: "ChatGPT, stop writing." williamthecoward hasn't started spamming ChatGPT in here yet, but I appreciate your getting ahead of him. I, meanwhile, have been writing like this for decades, and the proof of this is available to you in these very forums. There are threads in Movie Talk that I wrote before those programs even existed ( http://uto...m?id=movies&time=1758485876063 ). I do not need A.I. to write like this. Even in blue-book exams with a pen I can do this. It is easy for me compared to you because I am better at this than you. You are lesser. That is your nature. [williamthecoward]: "She literally sits writing tens of thousands of words of pyschotic nervous breakdown and posts all over the net instead of looking for a job." You continue to impotently project your own mental states as insults. It never works. Between the two of us, it is clear who has had psychotic breaks in this forum: you. My words are as always measured and clear, whereas yours are always like that of a brothel-visitor suffering a terminal syphilitic stupor. And given the decoder of recognizing your projections, are we now to suppose that you are looking for a job? That is very sad. This means that your work as a "translator" is probably a gig job. Will you admit then that you are a "freelance translator" who is not even consistently employed? Is your real "employer" merely a website that lists requests? This would explain how you are given temporary clients seeking short-lived assignments (e.g., medical pamphlets). That is very sad. This explains why you are so resentful. Things seem not to have worked out for you. Maybe you would not be in this position if you had not abused Ritalin to get through some pointless classes on philology which brought you nowhere and nothing? Maybe if you had balanced your soft works with STEM? Oh well, the best years of your life are spent, and now there is nothing but your perpetual aversion to improvement. [williamthecoward]: "Kargen in his lust for defending psychotic nazism deletes them." You really are fucking retarded. Every time *I* have deleted your posts *I* have posted the exact reasons for the deletion and linked to the content so that you can still view it. In the maybe 5 cases of my deleting your spam, it has only ever been *spam*. I even warn you before *I* delete it, and I have told you that it is *me* deleting it. As such, since you have now attempted to spam this thread with ChatGPT, be warned that if you continue to spam ChatGPT, any future spam will be deleted (the first case of spam in comment "Mon Mar 09 13:23:43" will not be deleted, even though you have indeed been warned not to post such spam in the past). This deletion will be accompanied by an explanation, and a link will be given so that you can still easily view the spam. This is your warning. ... ... This is an interesting article on how jews rape their own children: "The Child-Rape Assembly Line" [Vice; November 2013] https://archive.fo/eDOT9 "Rabbi Rosenberg believes around half of young males in Brooklyn's Hasidic community—the largest in the United States and one of the largest in the world—have been victims of sexual assault perpetrated by their elders. Ben Hirsch, director of Survivors for Justice, a Brooklyn organization that advocates for Orthodox sex abuse victims, thinks the real number is higher. "From anecdotal evidence, we're looking at over 50 percent. It has almost become a rite of passage."" This issue of jews raping their own children intersects with many other subjects: • jews supporting LGBTQ2S+NAMBLA / LGBTQ2S+P; jews attempting to sterilize, castrate, or "trans" White Western children; • jews being the central progenitors of pornography and the abuse of young peoples • pedophilia as psychological manipulation and initiation to conformism • Epstein being a pedophile jew who enabled pedophilia • "Israel" being a haven for pedophile jews who were fleeing prosecution in their host nations • jews using accusations of pedophilia to infiltrate and destroy Christian organizations why they themselves privately approve of pedophilia • jews as Moloch-worshippers and child-sacrificers • jews as perpetually mentally defective due to self-imposed traumas and trauma narratives • slave morality as often needing a cycle of abuse to propagate itself (e.g., subverted leftists often do not have their own children, so they substitute by abusing yours) Many of these things we so often taken for granted. For instance, it is well known that pedophile jews flee to "Israel" and that "Israel" thus has a high concentration of pedophile jews. We also know that pedophiles are largely created by other pedophiles. We also know that the left is largely composed of abused people. This is easily illustrated by asking leftists to tell of their stories of abuse; by the rules of the Celebration Parallax, if you do it as a "kind" exercise, they will largely admit to being products of abuse. Many gay or "trans" people are in fact created by abuse rather than by some natural proclivity, and it is a very predictable cliché that many "porn stars" will tell of the abuse that they suffered before their work in jewish pornography. Further, though, we know that jews value their slave morality as not just a nature but a cultural practice. Sexually abusing their children and the children of their hosts is a key component of perpetuating this slave morality, just as is their post-WWII psychosis. Of the post-WWII psychosis, we see how the jew often will attempt to tell lies about "generational trauma" and even falsify understandings of epigenetics, when, in reality, the jewish fixation on WWII and the "Shoah" for a century is caused by their own abuse of *themselves*. That is, they show their own children atrocity pornography at a young age to indoctrinate their children into a cycle of abuse. We can thus observe the same exercise in the jew as in the porn star. A porn star can be asked if someone abused her at a young age, and very predictably we find the answer is yes. A jew can be asked if someone abused the jew by telling it "Holocaust" fictions at a young age, and very predictably we find the same answer: yes. Just as the porn star lives under this cliché, we see the jew lives under the same cliché. There is no shortage of jews in interviews telling of how their parent or grandparent indoctrinated them at a young age with stories of survival in this camp or another. A jew's first memory may even be some story of perpetual victimhood. The jew thus sees a utility in one's very introduction to consciousness being a horror story. We see then how in the case of the jew it is not just the narrative and the atrocity porn of the "Shoah" but also the coupling of this atrocity porn with actual sexual abuse by fellow jews. The jew knows that if he abuses his children, they will internalize the trauma implicit in the jewish fictions surrounding the "Shoah". The sexual abuse strengthens their connection to the fiction and to their belief in their eternal victimhood, since they are making victims of themselves as they tell themselves psychotic stories. Of course, this technique of jews abusing their own children pre-figures the "Shoah", so this is not even unique to the last 100 years. The very practice of "Metzitzah b'peh" — which is an ancient *and* *current* practice wherein rabbis suck with their mouths the bleeding penis of a freshly circumcised child — is meant to sexually traumatize the jewish child. Many rabbis even spread STDs such as herpes to these infants, and thus herpes outbreaks in jewish communities are not uncommon. This abuse of children by jewish authority figures relates also to the jew's god, Memnoch the Devil, and its archetype, the Devouring Mother. This has to do with the cliché of leftists having rejected the father's discipline. That is, if one wanted to produce more slavish destroyers within a host society, then abusing the children of the host society would be a way to do it since such abused people would reject their fathers in favor of the Devouring Mother. (Aside, we can parallel this to jews ruining father figures in their Hollywood agitprop. We can also parallel this to jewish falsifications of history, where, for instance, lies are told of a normalized Greek pedophilia — this is largely an invention by jews who were projecting their own twisted histories into the West, whereas the West rejects these practices.) Simultaneously, abusing one's own children as the jew does would ensure that jewish children maintain their slave morality into adulthood, never out-growing the schoolyard immaturity of children's games of petty deceptions and victimhood pleas (as indeed most of the jew's deceptions are the adult translations of schoolyard tactics). In short, jews embrace pedophilia as a means of enforcing their trauma and victimhood narratives upon themselves. The West, in opposition, condemns the pedophiles and protects its children, and it is only the West's aversion to pedophiles that the jew will use in his same game of asymmetry to leverage or blackmail political figures into doing jewish bidding. That is, the jew does not care about pedophilia and in fact protects its pedophiles, but they know that the West opposes pedophiles, so the jew can use this asymmetry to destroy Western organizations from within. Of course, this destruction of Western organizations does not end pedophilia: the destroyed Western organization becomes a haven for the subverted left to introduce its *normalized* pedophilia (e.g., churches subverted into supporting the LGBTQ2S+NAMBLA), and this normalized pedophilia allows the jew to openly commit his acts of pedophilia. Or so the jew hopes. This again repeats the issue of the vampire in the sunlight. When the jew's nature is exposed, he disintegrates.
	show deleted posts

Your Name:
Your Password:
Your Message: